The following article is not mines. It comes from Ebh. I thought it was interesting, so I'm posting it.
Vglnk
Saturday, August 13, 2022
The Cure?
42 years ago, a Dr. Burzynski found a cure for a dis-ease that we thought no one would find. That dis-ease was Cancer. Doctor Burzynski went through years of legal battles. He came through and won. Below are snippets from the video that I wasn't able to download. My question is If the FDA and Supreme Court passed this why are people still going through Chemotherapy?
Saturday, February 26, 2022
Get Paid To Watch Videos
You earn money by watching promotional videos. Each video has a set amount that you will get after watching the full video. You can watch as many as you choose to.
Newcomers get a $10 dollar Sign-up bonus.
Friday, August 6, 2021
What Lawsuit did Robert F. Kennedy win?
https://mythdetector.ge/en/myth/what-lawsuit-did-robert-f-kennedy-jr-win-and-was-mandatory-vaccination-abolished-us
Social media users are still actively sharing the video uploaded by TV host Madona Koidze on August 14, 2020, in which Robert F. Kennedy Jr., an American anti-vaccine advocate and environmental lawyer, who is the nephew of former U.S. president John F. Kennedy, speaks about vaccines during an American talk show JONI Table Talk. Kennedy recollects failed attempts of creating vaccines against SARS-Cov, respiratory syncytial (sin-SISH-uhl) viruses and dengue fever, saying that vaccines against these diseases had caused “enhanced immune response.” He claims that the novel coronavirus vaccines may pose the same threat, noting that such doubts are further strengthened by the fact that Anthony Fauci, director of the U.S. National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, allowed vaccine manufacturers to skip animal trials and to go directly to human trials.
Madona Koidze’s post was again shared on April 7, 2021. Two Facebook users Xatuna Mamacashvili and Baia Baiadze shared it with identical captions, reading that in 2017, the White House appointed Robert Kennedy as a chair of the commission to review vaccine safety and that he won a lawsuit against the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) after he proved that no monitoring of vaccine safety had been conducted for over 32 years.
Davit Giorgobiani and Georgian anti-vaccination doctor, Tina Topuria also spread the posts about Robert Kennedy allegedly winning the lawsuit on vaccination. According to Giorgobiani’s post, Bill Gates, Anthony Fauci and the pharmaceutical companies lost the lawsuit because they failed to prove that the vaccines used in the United States over past 32 years were safe and consequently, the U.S. Supreme Court abolished universal vaccination. Tina Topuria spreads identical information referring to the article published on 1scandal.com.
Kennedy’s claim as if the COVID-19 vaccines skipped animal trials is disinformation. An assumption that the coronavirus vaccines will cause “enhanced immune response” lacks scientific evidence. Kennedy’s lawsuit against the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) was not about vaccine safety, but rather the Department’s failure to provide public information to an anti-vaccine organization. In addition, Bill Gates and Anthony Fauci had nothing to do with the court dispute. Neither did the court rule to abolish mandatory vaccination.
- The court did not rule into the case won by Robert F. Kennedy against the U.S. Department of Health that no monitoring of vaccine safety had been conducted for over 30 years and neither did it abolish mandatory vaccination.
The New York District Court adopted its decision picked up by social media users in July 2018 after Robert F. Kennedy and Informed Consent Action Network (ICAN), an anti-vaccine organization, filed a lawsuit against the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) for violating the Freedom of Information Act. According to the lawsuit, ICAN requested the U.S. Department of Health to provide the copies of vaccine safety reports, but failed to receive public information for several months. The same lawsuit notes that the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (NVICP) developed in 1986 requires HHS to submit biennial reports to two Congressional Committees detailing the improvements in vaccine safety made by HHS in the preceding two years. In response to ICAN’s request, HHS noted that it could not find the requested reports. Based on this official response received from HHS, ICAN claimed that the Department of Health has not conducted safety monitoring for over 30 years.
In an investigative article on April 28, 2019, journalist Jackie Kucinich found out what happened to the reports HHS did not provide. At a March 2019 hearing of the Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor and Pensions, Chairman Lamar Alexander said the reports were actually required within two years of the law’s implementation, not every two years. And, Alexander said, the HELP Committee has two reports from the Department submitted to Congress in 1988, and in 1989. Both of these reports were made public at Senator Alexander’s request in 2019.
HHS regularly conducts vaccine safety monitoring through various subordinate units. So, claiming the opposite based on this lawsuit only is a manipulation. For example, upon instructions of the U.S. National Academy of Sciences, several medical institutions and research centers prepare detailed vaccine safety reports that are submitted to HHS. In 2014, the latter also prepared a comprehensive report on safety of vaccines used for routine immunization in the United States. In addition, four HHS-subordinated committees are independently working on vaccine safety monitoring, among them FDA’s Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee, Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP), National Vaccine Advisory Committee (NVAC) and the Advisory Committee on Childhood Vaccines. All of these committees have independent experts, who constantly monitor vaccine safety at different stages and submit information to HHS. Moreover, four monitoring systems also oversee vaccine safety in the United States.
Neither Bill Gates nor Anthony Fauci are featuring in the case of ICAN and HHS. Furthermore, the court dispute was not about abolition of mandatory vaccination. There are several precedential decisions in the history of the U.S. Supreme Court, when citizens were demanding abolition of mandatory vaccination, but the court rejected their lawsuits.
- The claim as if the COVID-19 vaccines skipped animal trials is disinformation, while the assumption that the coronavirus vaccines will cause “enhanced immune response” lacks scientific evidence.
In the video spread on social media Kennedy speaks about the vaccines that caused an antibody-dependent enhancement (ADE) in the past, claiming that the COVID-19 vaccines pose the same threat. However, his claims lack scientific evidence. The antibody-dependent enhancement (ADE) is developed when a human initially suffers from mild symptoms, but in case of reinfection gets much sicker. ADE is typical for some respiratory viruses; therefore, theoretically, it is possible for SARS-Cov-2 to cause this disease. However, current empirical data about the virus and vaccines do not confirm that any approved COVID-19 vaccine will cause “enhanced immune response” or generally, COVID-19 has such effects on human bodies.
Identical claims about the coronavirus vaccines were also spread earlier. See details in Myth Detector’s article: Infodemic on “Obiektivi” TV.
Kennedy echoes another popular disinformation about the coronavirus vaccines, according to which Anthony Fauci allowed vaccine manufacturers to skip animal trials and to go directly to human trials. In fact, the approved COVID-19 vaccines have passed through all phases of animal and human trials. Myth Detector wrote about it in its earlier articles:
Is the COVID-19 Vaccine Tested Directly on Humans?
Facebook Page Spreads Eight Lies and Two Manipulations about Vaccination
- Who is Robert F. Kennedy and was he appointed by the White House as a chair of the commission to review vaccine safety?
Robert F. Kennedy Jr. is an American anti-vaccine advocate, conspiracy theorist, author, and environmental lawyer. In 2016, Kennedy founded Children’s Health Defense, an anti-vaccine and pseudoscience advocacy group, that may publish unverifiable information that is not always supported by evidence. According to the report released in January 2020, the organization founded by Kennedy accounted for 54% of anti-vaccine advertising content on Facebook. Robert Kennedy himself gained popularity among anti-vaccine groups by spreading disinformation and conspiracy theories about vaccines through his Facebook and Twitter accounts. According to the report released by the Center for Countering Digital Hate (CCDH) in March 2021, Kennedy is one of those 12 anti-vaccine influencers who regularly spread disinformation about vaccines and generate two thirds of anti-vaccination content on Facebook and Twitter.
Robert Kennedy told American media in 2017 that Donald Trump offered him the chairmanship of a commission that will examine “vaccination safety and scientific integrity” – something that triggered strong outcry from the scientific community, because Kennedy was voicing that scientists have repeatedly determined to be without merit. Despite his promise, Donald Trump abandoned the plan to set up the commission and even ceased talks with Kennedy on the issue.
By Medea Sulamanidze
Tuesday, July 27, 2021
Unauthorized Covid test recall
The FDA has identified this as a Class I recall, the most serious type of recall. Use of these devices may cause serious injuries or death.
Recalled Product
- Innova SARS-CoV-2 Antigen Rapid Qualitative Test (also distributed under the names Innova COVID-19 Self-Test Kit (3T Configuration), Innova SARS-CoV-2-Antigen Rapid Qualitative Test (7T Configuration), and Innova SARS-CoV-2-Antigen Rapid Qualitative Test (25T Configuration))
- Lot codes:
- 25T (25 tests per box) - U2101750, U2101751, X2006004, X2008001, X2008010, X2009002, X2009004, X2009013, X2009016, X2010004, X2010010, X2011005, X2011006, X2011007, X2011008, X2011009, X2011012, X2011013, X2011015, X2011016, X2011017, X2011025, X2011051, X2011052, X2012001, X2012002, X2012004, X2012005, X2012008, X2101002, X2101004, X2101014, X2101031, X2101038
- 3T (3 tests per box) - U2102003, X2012310
- 7T (7 tests per box) - U2101748, U2102001, U2102002, X2012711, X2103792
- Manufacturing Dates: September 1, 2020 to March 3, 2021
- Distribution Dates: November 2, 2020 to March 22, 2021
- Devices Recalled in the U.S.: At least 77,339
- Date Initiated by Firm: March 24, 2021
Device Description
The Innova SARS-CoV-2 Antigen Rapid Qualitative Test claimed to determine if a person has an active COVID-19 infection. The test used a nasal swab sample and test strip to detect specific proteins, called antigens, from the SARS-CoV-2 virus. If the nasal sample had SARS-CoV-2 antigens, a colored test line should have appeared on the test strip, indicating that the person may have COVID-19. If the nasal sample did not have SARS-CoV-2 antigens, a colored line should not have appeared on the test strip. The test has not been authorized, cleared, or approved by FDA for commercial distribution in the United States.
Reason for Recall
Innova Medical Group is recalling its SARS-CoV-2 Antigen Rapid Qualitative Test. Labeling distributed with certain configurations of the test includes performance claims that did not accurately reflect the performance estimates observed during the clinical studies of the tests. The performance characteristics of the test have not been adequately established, presenting a risk of false results.
- False-negative results may lead to delayed diagnosis or inappropriate treatment of SARS-CoV-2, which may cause patient harm including serious illness and death. False-negative results can also lead to further spread of the SARS-CoV-2 virus, including when presumed negative patients are grouped into cohorts in health care, long-term care, and other facilities based on false test results.
- False-positive results could lead to a delay in the correct diagnosis and the initiation of an appropriate treatment for the actual cause of patient illness, which could be another life-threatening disease that is not SARS-CoV-2. False-positive results could also lead to further spread of the SARS-CoV-2 virus when presumed positive patients are grouped into cohorts based on false test results.
Who May Be Affected
- People who were tested using these devices
- Health care providers who may have access to and use these tests or whose patients have used these tests
- Organizers of large testing programs, such as on college campuses, who may be using and distributing these tests for diagnostic use
What to Do
On April 23, 2021, Innova Medical Group sent all affected device users an Urgent Medical Device Recall letter. The letter provided the following information:
- Do not use these tests to screen for or diagnose COVID-19.
- Identify and remove all affected tests from inventory.
- Either destroy the tests by placing them in the trash or return the tests using the FedEx return label that was included with the letter Innova sent to its customers.
- Complete and return the form Innova sent to its customers, indicating the number of destroyed or returned tests.
The FDA also recommends:
- Test users and caregivers: Talk to your health care provider if you think you were tested with the Innova SARS-CoV-2 Antigen Rapid Qualitative Test and you have concerns about your test results.
- Health care providers: If the test was given less than two weeks ago, consider retesting your patients using a different SARS-CoV-2 diagnostic test if you suspect an inaccurate result. If testing was performed more than two weeks ago and there is no reason to suspect current SARS-CoV-2 infection, it is not necessary to retest.
- Testing program organizers: Notify participants in your testing program to discontinue diagnostic use of these tests and to use an FDA-authorized test to continue testing. For listings of FDA-authorized tests, see:
- Report any problems you experience with the Innova SARS-CoV-2 Antigen Rapid Test to the FDA, including suspected false results.
For more information, please see the FDA's June 2021 safety communication, Stop Using Innova SARS-CoV-2 Antigen Rapid Qualitative Test.
Contact Information
Customers with questions about this recall should contact Linda Weinreb at Linda.Weinreb@innovamedgroup.com or call 747-494-0852.
How do I report a problem?
Health care professionals and consumers may report adverse reactions or quality problems they experienced using these devices to MedWatch: The FDA Safety Information and Adverse Event Reporting Program using an online form, regular mail, or FAX.
Saturday, March 6, 2021
Wednesday, February 10, 2021
Plain and Simple Views
zChocolate
About Me

- ThoughtsMadeManifest
- I was born and raised in Detroit with two siblings .I took a journey into being a vegetarian and I am still on that journey. I am a Mom, Pre-K Teacher , writer and blogger. I enjoy the time with my daughter and my cat. my daughter and I have also adopted some of the cats in the neighborhood.