Checks and Balances

 

By D.I. Muhammad 

When we speak of the Constitution it needs to be understood that the conception of the U. S. Constitution came not from the minds of the founding fathers, but from the Iroquois Nation.

It was the Iroquois Nation that first created a Constitution before European arrival, the Mohawk, Oneida, Onondaga, Cayuga, and Seneca nations united under an oral constitution  establishing  a representative democracy with a system of checks and balances.

In 1751, Benjamin Franklin wanted to know what the Iroquois were doing that he explicitly wrote that if the Six Nations could form such a union, the colonies could too.  The following is in the language of Franklin's time.

"It would be a very strange Thing, if six Nations of ignorant Savages should be capable of forming a Scheme for such an Union, and be able to execute it in such a Manner, as that it has subsisted Ages, and appears indissoluble; and yet that a like Union should be impracticable for ten or a Dozen English Colonies..."

In 1987, the U.S. Congress passed a concurrent resolution the U.S. Congress passed a concurrent resolution officially acknowledging that the confederation of the original Thirteen Colonies was explicitly influenced by the political system of the Iroquois Confederacy.

"The Senate recognized the influence of the Haudenosaunee (Iroquois) Confederacy on the construction of the Constitution in a resolution read on September 16, 1987, that noted, “the original framers of the Constitution, including most notably, George Washington and Benjamin Franklin, are known to have greatly admired the concepts, principles and governmental practices of the Six Nations of the Iroquois Confederacy. Whereas the confederation of the original Thirteen Colonies into one republic was explicitly modeled upon the Iroquois Confederacy as were many of the democratic principles which were incorporated into the Constitution itself (3-4).”

The Haudenosaunee Confederacy established Gayanesshagowa, the Great Law of Peace, as its governing principle in 1142. The Mohawk, Oneida, Cayuga, Seneca, and Onondaga joined in the Great Law of Peace to form a confederacy; the Tuscarora joined them later. The Law of Peace includes its Chiefs, Clan Mothers, and Faith Keepers, the delegates that form the regulatory bodies of the confederacy. “Within Grand Council meet the Chiefs of each nation which then divide into sections of Elder Brothers and Younger Brothers”; the bicameral Congress is similar. The Clan Mothers have been compared to a high court; they serve for life, have been selected by consensus, and have the authority to remove council members.

The symbols of the union include the long house, the Tree of Peace, the eagle, and a cluster of arrows. The symbols represent a determination of peace and alliance for the group and the power of a unified front. Similarly, the U.S. adopted an eagle as its protector, and one of its symbols is thirteen arrows bound together. The tradition is that the chiefs maintained the council fire and met to discuss confederacy issues beneath the tree; the eagle that flew over the tree guarded the confederacy looking out for enemies, and a bunch of five arrows, one representing each nation, were bound together, with the observation that it is much harder to break a bundle of five arrows than just one arrow.

Constitutional convention members such as Benjamin Franklin were very familiar with the Haudenosaunee Confederacy nations and their founding principles. He reviewed Cadwallader’s The history of the five Indian nations depending on the province of New-York in America, and he wrote the article, 

“Short Hints Towards a Scheme for Uniting the Northern Colonies.” Franklin wrote to his printing partner, James Parker, “It would be a very strange Thing, if [the] Six Nations… should be capable of forming a Scheme for such an Union, and be able to execute it in such a Manner, as that it has subsisted Ages, and appears indissoluble; and yet that a like Union should be impracticable for ten or a Dozen English Colonies, to whom it is more necessary, and must be more advantageous.” He worked on the Albany Plan of Union and members of the Haudenosaunee Confederacy attended the Albany Congress, where members of northern colonies discussed forming a general council for their common defense." (The Library of Congress Blogs,The Library of Congress Blogs, https://blogs.loc.gov/law/2023/09/the-haudenosaunee-confederacy-and-the-constitution/)

Later among the Cherokee  nation, Sequoyah's noticed how the United States used written language to hold power, and he single-handedly invented a writing system for his own people to protect Cherokee sovereignty and culture.

This is where the U.S. Constitution truly came from and how it was born.  The U.S. Constitution adapted several foundational structural concepts from the Haudenosaunee (Iroquois) Confederacy's Great Law of Peace, which provided a blueprint for uniting independent states under a centralized, democratic system.

The American Founders did not plagiarize  the Iroquois system exactly, the conceptual framework of their government mirrors the Haudenosaunee model in several  ways:

1. Federalism and Shared Sovereignty

With, The Great Law of Peace united five (and later six) distinct, sovereign nations under one Grand Council. Each nation retained control over its internal local affairs, while the Grand Council handled common issues like foreign policy and defense.

In the Constitution it directly mirrors the American system of federalism, where individual states maintain local governance while sharing power with a centralized federal government.

2.  The Haudenosaunee Grand Council split its decision-making into two distinct deliberative bodies based on seniority. The "Older Brothers" (Mohawk and Seneca) and the "Younger Brothers" (Oneida and Cayuga) discussed policies separately before bringing them to the Onondaga (the firekeepers) for final approval. (https://www.haudenosauneeconfederacy.com/government/)

 (New York state Education Department  (.gov), nysd.gov)

With the Constitution The Founders similarly split the U.S. Congress into two chambers, the House of Representatives and the Senate,  that required a bill to pass both separate bodies before becoming law.

3. The Onondaga nation held a unique executive role within the council, holding  the power to veto decisions made by the other nations if they believed the proposal was harmful to the Great Law. However, their veto could be overridden if the other nations stood unified against it.

This structure resembles the American system of presidential veto power and the congressional override mechanism.

4. Clan Mothers held the ultimate power to select chiefs based on merit. If a leader became corrupt, acted selfishly, or failed to serve the people, the Clan Mothers had the authority to strip them of their title and remove them from office.

The American Founders institutionalized this concept through the process of impeachment, allowing the legislature to remove an executive or judicial official who abuses power.

5. The Haudenosaunee symbolized their alliance using the "Great White Pine," where individual arrows were bound together to show that a single arrow breaks easily, but a bundle is unbreakable.

Franklin used a different image, a cut-up snake, to make the same argument for colonial unity. This symbolism was famously adapted by Benjamin Franklin in his "Join, or Die" cartoon and later captured in the official U.S. motto, E Pluribus Unum ("Out of many, one").

E. Plurbus Unum was then replaced, it was never gotten rid of, in 1956 when Eisenhower signed in law the official motto of, "In God We Trust. (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/In_God_We_Trust)

This is one of the places the U.S. Constitution came from.  Where the idea of checks and balances were built from.  After they created their Constitution, and as much as the "Five Tribes" did to work with thus New America, they were still pushed off their land to the west of the Mississippi,  killed or enslaved just so a government could run that offered land to immigrants from another land.

What the Orders Actually Say

Executive orders are how a president directs the executive branch. They can't override the Constitution or Congress, and courts can strike them down, as the Supreme Court did in Youngstown (1952). Here are the orders and actions tied to what's in the news now, in the order they happened.

"The calm before the storm" (October 5, 2017). Trump posed for photos with senior military leaders and their spouses before a White House dinner. He said it might be "the calm before the storm." 

When reporters asked what storm, he told them they'd find out. About a week later, CNBC reported, he seemed to point to North Korea. The meeting that day covered Iran, North Korea, Afghanistan, and ISIS.

Human trafficking. Two orders come up most. EO 13818 (December 2017) allows sanctions that freeze the assets of foreign people involved in serious human rights abuse and corruption. EO 13903 (January 31, 2020) tells federal agencies to coordinate on prosecuting traffickers and people who exploit children online, support victims, and expand prevention education. It also created a full-time White House position on the issue. Neither order creates military trials or secret arrests.

EO 13848 (September 12, 2018). This order declared a national emergency over foreign interference in U.S. elections. It does four things:

• The Director of National Intelligence must assess any foreign interference within 45 days after each election.
• DHS and DOJ report on whether election or campaign infrastructure was affected.
• The Treasury Department can sanction foreign persons found responsible.
• Agencies recommend further sanctions.
• 
  

When he signed it, Trump noted that state and local governments run elections. The emergency has been renewed every year, most recently on August 31, 2026. With the midterms on November 3, the 45-day mark falls around December 18, 2026. 

During the 2020 elections Trump claimed the Elections were tampered.  It would later come out that Dominion tampered with the voting machines using a black box to flip votes, and to submit votes without a voter voting.   Which is why up to the point of this writing Trump still talks about election fraud.

The Insurrection Act. The law lets a president send in the military or federalize the National Guard to suppress an insurrection or enforce federal law. In 2020, Trump's White House raised it during the protests after George Floyd's death, but he did not invoke it. It was last invoked in 1992, during the Los Angeles riots. In January 2025, his border emergency order asked for a report on whether to invoke it. He has since said he would consider it and hasn't ruled it out around the midterms.

EO 13961 (December 7, 2020). One of the last orders of Trump's first term, it directs the executive branch to build up its ability to keep operating through catastrophic emergencies, and came with a Federal Mission Resilience Strategy. It covers planning, an interagency committee, and backup arrangements for agency leadership. It applies to the executive branch only.

Biden's term (2021-2025)

Biden signed 162 executive orders. As with Trump, courts and the next president shaped what lasted.

Border and immigration. EO 14010 (February 2021) set up a regional framework to address migration and asylum. EO 14011 created a task force to reunite separated families.

Voting. EO 14019 (March 7, 2021), "Promoting Access to Voting," directed agencies to look at ways to expand access to voter registration and election information. Supporters called it a voting-access measure, Republicans criticized it as overreach, and reporting on it noted it tells agencies to act within existing law.

Vaccine requirements. EO 14042 (September 2021) required federal contractors to follow a COVID vaccination rule, and EO 14043EO 14043 required vaccination for federal employees. The Courts pushed back: a federal judge in Georgia blocked the contractor rule nationwide in December 2021, and other courts blocked it in several states, though the Ninth Circuit disagreed in 2023. The White House later dropped the requirement. The Supreme Court also blocked a separate OSHA rule for large employers in January 2022 (NFIB v. OSHA).

Student loans. This wasn't an executive order, but it's another example of a limit. The Supreme Court struck down Biden's student loan forgiveness plan in Biden v. Nebraska (2023).

His final weeks. In January 2025, Biden signed a run of routine orders, including six on January 3 setting orders of succession within departments, which name who acts if a department head can't. On January 19, EO 14146 partially revoked Trump's EO 13961EO 13961, removing the committee and implementation sections and keeping the strategy.

Back to Trump (2025)

On January 20, 2025, Trump's EO 14148 rescinded 78 of Biden's orders and memoranda, including EO 14019EO 14019. In March 2025, EO 14239 ordered a review of all national continuity policies, with recommendations to revise, rescind, or replace them.

Trump's EO 14248, Preserving and Protecting  The Integrity of American Elections.  It was created to enforce federal law and to enforce integrity in the election process. 

Presidents of both parties have signed orders that courts later limited, blocked, or reversed. That's the system of checks I described in Part 1.

---

Sources:

• Executive Order 13903 (American Presidency Project)
• EO 13848 (Federal Register PDF via OFAC)
• Lawfare: What's in the Executive Order on Election Interference?
• Trump's 2018 statement on signing EO 13848 (GovInfo)
• Continuation of the national emergency, Federal Register, Sept. 2, 2026
• Fox News: Trump says he'd consider invoking the Insurrection Act
• The Hill: Trump not ruling out the Insurrection Act around the midterms
• NBC News: "Calm before the storm"
• CNBC: Trump on the "calm before the storm" remark
• Executive Order 13961 (GovInfo)
• Executive Order 14146 (GovInfo)
• Executive Order 14239 (American Presidency Project)
• List of executive actions by Joe Biden
• Ballotpedia: Multistate lawsuits against the federal government, 2021
• McDonald Carano: Status of the federal contractor vaccination

All of this leads us to where we are with everything going on around us right now. In the next section, "Will You Listen Now",  I'll explain, and show more of what the media may not have shown to you. 

The Divine Spark Within

 

By D. I. Muhammad

Before there was any God that you are familiar with, there was The Most High. Some know it as Source. The Creator of All. 

This Creator is not jealous of anything that you do. This Creator is not male or female in the physical sense.  Its energy carries both, a feminine and masculine current. This Creator does not ask for your worship or that you pay tithes.   This Creator created your gods,  that you pray to, and worship. 

These lower level gods have looked for ways to dupe humanity into worshipping them.  These are the gods that need your energy, your acknowledgement in order to survive.  Without it, they die.  They die because they are no longer remembered.   It's the remembrance that keeps them being venerated.

Years ago, I and friend of mine had an encounter with some people we had a talk with. At the end the person said to us, "I'll pray for you."  My friend then said, "Don't pray for me. I don't know who you pray to."

Some may see that responds as rude, but it stopped me, because I saw that comment as valid and true. 

There are many gods, and it's been that way since the beginning, starting with  Sumeria.

With each new culture the pantheon of gods have changed. Even across archetypes there have been gods who are the same, but within a different lineage.  For example,  Inanna and Oshun are both aligned with beauty and fertility.  Thor and Shango are both aligned with Thunder. 

There have been ancient rulers who have declared themselves as divine or were declared divine.

Throughout history, there have been many who crowned themselves god, or allowed others to crown them, and demanded worship as proof of their power.

It started with kings. Naram-Sin of Akkad called himself a god while he still lived, and had himself carved wearing the horned helmet that was meant only for the divine. The pharaohs of Egypt held that same claim for three thousand years. Each one was Horus while he breathed, and became Osiris the moment he died, and the people paid tribute to keep that belief alive. Akhenaten went even further. He declared himself and the sun itself the only gods worth worship, and tried to erase every god that came before him.

Alexander the Great stood before the Oracle of Siwa and came back calling himself the son of Zeus. It secured him an empire. Antiochus, a Greek king who ruled over Judea, took the title "God Manifest," and placed a statue of himself inside the Jewish Temple, demanding the people bow to it.

Rome made a system out of it. Caesar was declared a god after his death. Augustus allowed his spirit to be worshipped while he still lived. Caligula and Domitian wanted more. They demanded worship while breathing, built temples to themselves, and punished anyone who refused to kneel. Even Rome, who created this, called them excessive.

The Emperor Constantine needed a single, unified religion to hold the fracturing Roman Empire together.

By taking Jesus, who taught that everyone has the kingdom of god within them, and turning him into the exclusive, monolithic God that required absolute obedience, the Roman state successfully weaponized his image. They turned a teacher of the "inner spark" into another lower-level deity that demanded worship for the empire's survival. This was the moment the official doctrine about Jesus's nature was locked in under imperial pressure. (The First Council of Nicea, https://www.britannica.com/event/First-Council-of-Nicaea-325)

Lower-level gods not only appeared in the Mediterranean. Japan's emperors were said to descend from the sun goddess Amaterasu, a divine claim the state upheld until 1946, when Hirohito finally renounced it. The Inca believed their Sapa Inca descended from the sun god Inti himself, and worshipped him as a living god while he walked among them.

And it hasn't stopped. In the last century, Father Divine told his followers plainly that he was God in the flesh. Jim Jones, David Koresh, Marshall Applewhite, and Sun Myung Moon each stood in that same seat, convincing people that salvation ran through them and no one else. Some of those stories ended in isolation. Some ended in death.

This is not an ancient habit humanity outgrew. It is a pattern that has repeated in nearly every era, right up until now. Someone declares themselves god, or lets others declare it for them, and calls the obedience that follows devotion.

What is so different from these ancient ones calling themselves Divine.  Aren't we all considered Divine in some way.  Don't we carry a piece of The Most High within us?   All souls carry the spark of The Most High.

Isa (Jesus) carried that divine spark, and showed the people what they were capable of doing.  He showed the people they were capable of healing,  manifesting water into wine, and feeding the masses on fish and bread.   He never asked for the worship of the people. In fact it was during the Council of Nicea that they lined Jesus's divinity with being worshipped.

Jesus was revered while alive, and upon his crucifixion was he then worshipped as a God  by the Jews.  (Jesus Worship, https://www.bibleodyssey.org/articles/jesus-worship/)

Jesus's immediate followers (who were Jewish) did begin to revere and worship him, but this caused a massive, violent rift with mainstream Judaism.  Because mainstream Jews rejected Jesus as the Messiah or God, these followers eventually broke away entirely to form a new, separate religion: Christianity.

It is said Source fractalized itself, so that it could experience emotions,  and situations among its creation. Something it could not do as a pure consciousness.   It's said that humans hold their Autonomy. It's the spark that moves through the soul, that gives life, and experiences.

Here's the thing about the "gods" who chose to have humanity worship them. It was based off of ego,  power.  

When Source fragments into humans and lower-level deities, those fragments develop an ego to experience individuality. But the ego's greatest fear is insignificance and death.

The  lower-level deities successfully duped humanity into feeding them energy, it did something catastrophic to the human psyche: it fractured humanity against itself.

Because these lower gods are limited, insecure fragments, they operate from a mindset of scarcity. They convinced their respective cultures that divine favor is a limited resource. This birthed the tribal religious ego, the toxic claim of "My God is the one true God, and your god is not."

Instead of recognizing that every culture was just interacting with different  facets of the same cosmic puzzle, humanity began slaughtering one another to prove whose deity was superior. The wars fought in the names of these gods were never about The Most High; they were proxy wars fought by human proxies to feed the starved egos of competing, lower-level entities.

The ultimate irony of history is that every king who wore a horned helmet, every emperor who claimed the sun, every competitive deity, and every cult leader who demanded blind obedience was already divine. They carried the spark of The Most High within them from the very beginning. But blinded by the ego of the fragment, they forgot that they were already connected to the ocean. They chose instead to become starving gods, demanding that humanity feed them the very energy they forgot they already possessed.

My Exhaustion Caught Up To Me

 

By D.I. Muhammad 

Well, I believe my exhaustion has caught up with me. In an earlier blog, I wrote how exhausted I was. 

On November 3, I got up and I pressed my hair out to get myself ready for work. I felt fine.  I got dressed, and went downstairs to get a plastic bag out my cabinet in the dining room for some tortilla chips. I was hungry. It was what I could grab quick to eat.

 I trip over one  of my cats. I caught the arm of the couch. Bent over half way. When I stood up straight to walk, my legs gave out on me. I called to my daughter who was in the living room, "I fell."  She came to see about me.  I just sat there saying, "Nope. I'm not going in. This is a sign to be still." Telling my daughter to grab my phone.   I sent in our app what happened,  and I wasn't coming in.  I'm one of those people that rarely takes off.  That morning I wasn't playing with my health. 

After sitting on that floor for 5 minutes,  I slowly stood up. When I did I felt the dizziness kick in. I slowly walk back up the stairs, undressed, and put my night clothes back on and rested.  It was a scary feeling. I'm thinking I was just dehydrated.  I drunk water and alot of other liquids, and rested.

Tuesday, I'm still a little lightheaded, so I'm moving slow. I'm debating whether or not to go in or to the doctor, and then go in.  I decide on Urgent Care.   I call in again to let them know I'm going to the doctor since I didn't make it yesterday,  and I'll be in later.

I get to the doctor, and when I see him I tell him what happened.   He tells me it could be related to diet, and my BP being a little high.  I tell him that I'm Vegetarian and I do intermittent fasting.  He then says  since I'm a Vegetarian and do Intermittent fasting it could be genes or stress from my environment. 

He gave me something for my lightheadedness, and was told I was clear to go back Thursday.  

I did go back Thursday, and it was a struggle.  My kids whining was like nails on a chalkboard.   Whenever I had to walk those halls, or to take them out for recess my wish was not to fall out.  I sat on the bench for recess, and those that didn't listen were sitting with me. 

I took off Friday and for Monday because I put in the PTO two weeks prior.

I'm staying hydrated, drinking water, coconut water, beet juice, and other liquids. I find I need to eat something for Breakfast.  I normally don't. 

I'm going to try a raw diet. It helped me out in 2008 when I got in a car accident.

I knew a herbal doctor at the time, and he put me on a raw diet that worked.  So, my instinct is saying do it again. I don't like the doctor, and I don't like taking their medication. 

I'm still a little lightheaded. I still walk with caution. People may see me leaning on a wall or door,  simply because the dizziness is kicking in. This is the most stressful year i have experienced doing this job. 

My exhaustion has caught up to me, and I need to be looking into something else. After this year I don't think I can do another year. I'll see how this flows. 

There's an adage that goes through my mind right now, "Tomorrow is not promised."  The other is, "Don't put off tomorrow what you can do today."

Live. Love. And Know You Are Already whole as a person, and Free. 

The Distraction Starts

            

By D. I. Muhammad

On November 1, 2026 as I was scrolling through social media, a person posted a video of them driving down a highway with their dash cam on. What they caught on camera was something that whipped quickly across the sky, and in the distance you see fire from the crash.

My thought. Wow, that's awful.

I keep scrolling and I come upon another video from that same plane that crashed, but from another angle.  This time someone happens to catch the crash as it happens, leaving a hole in the ground.   After it hits people who saw it walk to hole that has fire coming out of it.

My thoughts now.  Something doesn't feel right, or look right with this scenario.   

In my last post, Let People Love: A Look at Polygamy In The Bible, I mentioned that Israel Ford's debacle felt like a distraction.  Why do I say that? Because it's illegal in the United States. They made sure of that making the marriage license the form of union.  Now, if the Ford's took another route, then it's what they did.  It still feels like a distraction,  and so does this.  

The Elections are tomorrow.  Everyone keeps saying, there is not a government in place.  These evil bastards are still fighting one another on who will rule the people,  and as I told you in a post, Trump signed an Executive Orders back in 2016. One was to return the land back to the Copper colored people.  That's also why I mentioned doing your genealogy. 

Why are they trying to avert attention from the elections tomorrow?

Why are other countries claiming to have sent the missle?

This blog is just my log on what is being put out to the public.  Later, when things truly start to come forward I have the stepping stones to how it ended up where ever its trying to go.   It may not go far at all.  People are beyond tired of the dog and pony show.  

Rod Session on Florida 11/02/26

The  incident in Florida.

Was that a plane that hit? No

Was it a jet?  No

Was that a missle? Yes

Was it from another country? No

Was it us? Yes

So our own country hit itself? Yes

This is a 9llish attack? Yes

The strapple I saw in a video was it from the missle? Yes

Did the missle hit Palm Springs? No

Palm Beach? Yes

Is that close to Mar a Lago? Yes

So the place it hit did it leave a hole in the ground? Yes

The  object that hit did it go so far down that it hit something to start a fire? Yes

Is the hole in Palm Springs? No

Palm Beach? Yes

Did people get hurt? No

Was this to divert attention from the Mid-terms? Yes

Is any of the images we've seen cgi? Yes

Is this a distraction?  Yes

Is the audio that was released from the plane they are telling us that hit Florida, real? No

So it's scripted? Yes

Is this to cause fear and panic? Yes

To take us into a lockdown? Yes
 

The man who analysis the pictures he takes or gets from others woth his phone. Are those really fourth dimension images? Yes

Why? To finish the mass arrest? Yes

The next video is a man who analysis the crash pictures on a different way.  With his camera he can see the images in fourth dimension.   

The Transmission From the "Plane" Before It Crashed 

The Strapple.  

Military fly over today.

Mar a Lago protected. It's said they put this up on October 31, 2026, then on Nov. 1, this "plane" hits Florida. 

Listen to what she tells you and what the following video tells you, so you can put the pieces together for yourself.

Everything is for you to put the pieces together for yourself. That's not the media's job. They were never suppose to give opinions only information. 

My opinion for this next one is, they are rounding civilians up who fall under the EO Trump made in 2016 regarding human trafficking.  This may have been a bomb threat, but how did they know who to go get off the plane?

There is a magazine called, The Economist, that caught people's attention after 9/11 happened. Why? Because they had the Twin Towers o the cover. In order for them not to reap karma for what they plan to do, they have to tell you their plans. That's not how karma works, and they do tell us. In movies, TV shows, magazine covers, but how many people really pay attention. Whether you read the magazine or not. Whether you know of it or not, they feel they told you.  

To answer her question. No, I've never heard or seen a plane take a nose dive unless the equipment was faulty.

These residents said it wasn't a plane.  Now I want you to compare the Strappel video to this one. Is that the same hole?

Podcast snippet

Mainstream news does not give you everything.  Did you knowcall the news channels in the U.S. are owned by only six people.    Yes, there's a hole.  Where is the plane? Some of the biggest pieces should be in that hole.  Where are the people? Bodies should be laying somewhere close by.  I'm not trying to be insensitive at all.  But I'm asking real questions. 

A plane in Philadelphia went down. Is that being talked about? Before any of this happened a plane pilot saw something shiny in the sky with them going into Philadelphia.  Are they talking about that. 

Did you know that today, November  3, 2026, Palm Bay, FL was hit with 2 feet of rain water?  They can't vote unless it was done early.

All this is tied around the mid-terms, don't really mean anything.  I'll get it more in my next blog.

Continue to live your life. Love, but stay cautious and watch these mofo's out here playing in people's faces. 

Will You Listen Now? (Coming Soon)

Let People Love: A Look At Polygamy In The Bible

 

By D. I. Muhammad 

I'm sure most have heard of Pastor Israel Ford, who has been circulating online after coming out about being in a polygamous marriage.

If you have read my blog series, History of Marriage, then you would realize that monogamous and polygamous marriages have been around since the beginning with the Sumerians.   You can read The History of The Marriage License: Ancient Sumeria  and Ancient Egypt.

Most religious people have an issue with this because Israel Fotd is a pastor. Now, everybody is running through this couple's past history.

Have people forgotten that polygamy is running through the Bible?

• Lamech was the first recorded polygamist in the biblical narrative. He married two women: Adah and Zillah (Genesis 4:19).

• Abraham: Married Sarah, but took her Egyptian servant Hagar as a wife/concubine at Sarah's request to bear a child (Ishmael). After Sarah's death, he also married Keturah (Genesis 16:3, 25:1).

• Saul: The first king of Israel, who had at least one wife, Ahinoam, and a prominent concubine, Rizpah (1 Samuel 14:50, 2 Samuel 3:7).

• David: King David had at least eight named wives, including Michal, Abigail, Ahinoam of Jezreel, Maacah, Haggith, Abital, Eglah, and Bathsheba, alongside numerous unnamed concubines (2 Samuel 3:2–5, 5:13).

• Solomon: Holds the most famous account of royal polygamy in the biblical text, maintaining 700 wives of royal birth and 300 concubines. The text notes that his foreign marriages eventually led him to worship foreign deities (1 Kings 11:1–3).

• Nahor: Abraham's brother, who had both a primary wife, Milcah, and a concubine, Reumah (Genesis 22:20–24).

• Jacob: Famously tricked into marrying two sisters, Leah and Rachel, after working for their father, Laban. He also had children with their respective maidservants, Zilpah and Bilhah, whom he took as wives (Genesis 29–30).

• Esau: Jacob's twin brother, who married three women: Judith, Basemath, and Mahalath (Genesis 26:34, 28:9).

But once you search a digital Bible, biblegateway.com, you find out there were others who also practiced polygamy, such as:

• Gideon: A prominent judge who "had many wives" and at least one concubine in Shechem, fathering 70 sons (Judges 8:30–31).

• Jair: A Gileadite judge who had 30 sons, implying multiple wives (Judges 10:4).

• Ibzan and Abdon: Subsequent judges whose massive numbers of children (30 sons/30 daughters and 40 sons/30 grandsons, respectively) indicate large polygamous households (Judges 12:8–14).

• Elkanah: The father of the prophet Samuel, who had two wives: Hannah and Peninnah. The text highlights the intense emotional friction and rivalry between them (1 Samuel 1:1–7).

• Rehoboam: Solomon's son, who followed his father's example by taking 18 wives and 60 concubines (2 Chronicles 11:21).

• Abijah: Who married 14 wives (2 Chronicles 13:21).

• Ahab: The northern king who had a vast household, fathering 70 sons (2 Kings 10:1).

• Jehoram and Joash: Had multiple wives (2 Chronicles 21:14, 24:3).

• Shaharaim: Who had three wives: Hushim, Baara, and Hodesh (1 Chronicles 8:8–9).

• Ashhur: The founder of Tekoa, who had two wives: Helah and Naarah (1 Chronicles 4:5).

In biblical law, there are rules on inheritance and marrying sisters.

Biblical law (specifically the Mosaic Law or Torah) did not explicitly institute or endorse polygamy. Instead, it treated polygamy as an existing cultural reality and enacted civil regulations to manage it, focusing primarily on protecting vulnerable wives, ensuring fair inheritance for children, and curbing political excesses.

The primary statutes governing polygamy in the Old Testament include:

1. Protection of Marital Rights for an Existing Wife

If a man took a subsequent wife, biblical law strictly prohibited him from neglecting or diminishing his responsibilities toward his first wife. 

"If he takes another wife to himself, he shall not diminish her food, her clothing, or her marital rights." (Exodus 21:10)

It was to prevent a husband from financially or emotionally abandoning an older or less favored wife in favor of a new one.

2. Protection of Firstborn Inheritance Rights

Polygamous households frequently suffered from intense favoritism, which could lead a husband to alter his estate planning based on which wife he preferred.

This rule mandates that if a man has two wives, one loved and one unloved, and both bear him sons, he cannot give the firstborn's double-portion inheritance to the son of the loved wife if the unloved wife's son was actually born first. (Deuteronomy 21:15–17)

It was written to legally protect the eldest son's rights and guard the less-favored wife from financial ruin after her husband's death.

3. Absolute Prohibition Against Marrying Sisters

While earlier patriarchs like Jacob married sisters (Leah and Rachel), the later Mosaic Law explicitly banned this specific arrangement.

"And you shall not take a woman as a rival wife to her sister, uncovering her nakedness while her sister is still alive." (Leviticus 18:18)

4. Limits on the Monarchy

The limits that applied to ordinary men would also apply to future kings.

"And he shall not acquire many wives for himself, lest his heart turn away..." (Deuteronomy 17:17)

As is shown in the Bible, Solomon ignored this, taking on wives and concubines.

There are rules that one must follow according to the religion that they practice. The taking on of many women is a serious responsibility. This is not solely about sex. At least it shouldn't be. For a man to take on more than one wife is him saying he will protect you, he will honor you, and he will make certain that others do this as well.

In Islam, men can have up to four wives, but as one continues to read, it tells men that if they only knew, they would be better off with one. 

"And if you have reason to fear that you might not act equitably towards orphans, then marry from among [other] women such as are lawful to you even] two, or three, or four: but if you have reason to fear that you might not be able to treat them with equal fairness, then [only] one - or [from among] those whom you rightfully possess. This will make it more likely that you will not deviate from the right course." (Al-Nisa, 4:3, Translator,  Muhammad Asad)

Rabbi Gershom ben Yehuda of Mainz, 1,000 years ago, issued a famous decree (Cherem d'Rabbeinu Gershom) explicitly forbidding Ashkenazi Jewish men from marrying more than one wife and requiring a wife's consent for divorce. 

So, I'm not understanding why the Christian community is so offended by the choice that was made. The examples are in your Bible. No one said you had to participate in the practice. It's not for everyone. Not every man has the fortitude or mindset to justly deal with two women.

The conversation between people who choose this path should be:

• What does a polygamous marriage look like for one to stay in it?

• How will the man treat both of his wives?

• How will he split his time among them?

• What does assistance for both of them look like?

Israel's stepdaughter has also spoken out in an interview. 

She said she wasn't going to speak on this, but after seeing the skits, the animations, and the comments online, she was drawn to come out and speak. In the interview, she described his character as narcissistic. That speaks to him as a man, not to polygamy itself. If a second wife is coming in, it's the first wife's job to let her know about this if she inquires, which she should.

Still most people who are hearing this are upset that three consenting adults chose to do this. Why? Because he's a pastor?  I'm not taking up for him or what he and his wife decided to do. I honestly feel this whole thing going viral all over the internet is a distraction.  The people are given one thing to distract them while something else is taking place. somewhere else.  Whatever needs to be revealed about them will be. I'm just here to point out that polygamy does exist. Now, if Shakela is his daughter, blood or step, that means he was grooming her, and that is something I do not agree with.   

There are everyday people who practice polygamy (a broader term for a person having more than one spouse), polygyny (one man with multiple wives), and polyandry (a woman with multiple husbands). These types of marriages are agreements that the parties involved in them made with one another. I address the legality of polygamy in my blog, History of the Marriage License: The Rise of The Marriage License.

Questions on Michigan Politics, U.S. Politics, Spirituality , and Cern

By D. I. Muhammad 

The following are questions that I had, and I did a Dowsing Rod Session to get some answers.  Again, these are not my answers or opinions. I asked these questions from my spirit team, and these are the answers.  Some answers will make sense automatically and some answers may not because certain things may not have played out in this physical realm yet for it to take form. 

This is why you may hear people say as above so below.  Because things happen in the spirit before making its way to the physical. Things can change depending on decisions people make here in the physical.  Some situations are what they are supposed to be because The Divine is guiding a situation.   So, if answers seem confusing, this is why. 

I've included videos to give a better context to the questions I was drawn to ask.   Nothing is asked to induce fear.  That's not what i do over here.  Everything here on my blog is meant to inform. Again these are not my answers or opinions, they come from spirit.  Take what resonates, and leave the rest behind.

Trump and his Administration 

 

During Trump's first term in 2016, was that the real Donald Trump? Yes

Was Trump switched out from a youthful looking Donald to the one we saw in 2016? No

It was said that President Biden died in 2018. Was this true? Yes

                                       (Added October 30, 2026)

While President Trump was serving his first Presidency, did he enforce laws that were of a benefit for humanity? Yes

Executive Orders that protected children from human trafficking? Yes

Laws that benefited "Black" people in the return of this land? Yes

Was he racist? No

Its said that Trump had a clone during the time of his first presidency. Is that true? No

Did he ever have a body double? Yes

The color of his tie. Was that of significance? Yes

If so, you could tell by the color of the tie he wore? Yes

At that time the only color ties he wore were red and blue? Yes

Is Kim Grogen's information trust worthy? Yes

Has she ever misrepresented information to the public? No

Now that he is in his Presidency for the second time. The video by Kim states that Donald Trump died. Is this true? Yes

If so, was it in 2024? No

2023? Yes

Was it by natural causes? No

By Tribunal at Gitmo? Yes

Did the Simpsons predict Trumps death? No

They already knew he was dead and was showing us? Yes

Are we seeing a clone now in the spotlight? Yes

Robotoid? No

A person in a body suit? No

Is the U.S. being ran solely by the military? Yes

We kept hearing 'Central Casting' back in his first Presidency and now in this one.  Is he telling us the people around him are just actors? Yes

(Added Nov. 1,2026)

Does the government still exist? No

Was the White House ever up for sale and listed on Zillow? Yes

Is the White House currently empty? Yes

Is the White House used for show for the public only? Yes

Are government buildings shut down in Washington, D. C.? Yes

(Added Nov. 1, 2026)

Was D.C. dropped from Washington, and is known now as just Washingtion? Yes

Why? Because it no longer holds Federal Jurisdiction? Yes

Are goverments all over the world non-existant? Yes

This Dell woman. Was she taken out? No

What people see on TV of her. Was she replaced? Yes

Is this Dell woman still alive? Yes

In a bunker? Yes

Is she being shown to show us that extraterrestrial beings exist? Yes

Is she one? yes

They have replaced her with an extraterrestrial in a body suit? Yes

Is she a Robotoid? No

Is the world physically being shown a reset trying to be pushed in? Yes

Is this what 2030 is. A reset? Yes

Will it happen? No

Is this why they are accelerating things before 2030? Yes

Is Project Looking Glass real? Yes

Did they see an outcome they didn't like? Yes

The reason for the acceleration? Yes

Government Reset

Is this video accurate concerning the installation of a new government? Yes

Is it even worth voting? No

Would voting in the elections knock all votes out as void? Yes

The new installation of a government, if this were to happen, would begin in February 2027? No

The installation of a new government would begin in March? Yes

Would there be a new President? No

The same President? Yes

Would the U.S., then be a Republic? Yes

Is the U.S., technically a Republic now? Yes 

Is the U.S., currently a corporation? No

Are people being tried at Jag under Tribunals? Yes

 

Under Nuremberg law? Yes

So, folks who have lied, and withheld the people's sovereignty are being tried, and executed? Yes

Does this include the following:

Law enforcement? Yes

Judges? Yes

Lawyers? Yes

Doctors? Yes

Attorneys? Yes

Those who harmed others who could not, or didn't have anyway to defend themselves? Yes

Regular people who are doing harming towards others, such as sexual abuse? Yes

Kidnapping? Yes

Torture towards others? Yes

The big offenses are held at JAG? Yes

Is this why there is talks of a worldwide blackout? Yes

Understand that if this grid did go down the military bases already have the technology to keep them up and online.  

If there is one. Would it be long? No

Less than a week? No

How long would it be? Give me a count, and I'll count it as weeks? 6

If there was a blackout it would be 6 weeks? Yes

Will this blackout truly affect everyone in this country? No

Some people will not be affected by the blackout? No

Is this why they are trying to incite another lock down? Yes

Will the lockdown happen? No

Should people be scared? No

Should they be cautious? Yes

Should people stock up on food? No

Will it be necessary for people to stock up on food? No

When the blackout happens will the grocery stores still be open? Yes

Am I asking the right questions? Yes

Because the answer to the last one is confusing me.  I am asking the right questions? Yes

Will people still be able to use money? No

These trials have been happening since Trump's first Presidency? Yes

(Added Nov. 1, 2026)

Patents 

Is it true the soul can be extracted and saved? No

Are there any entity's doing this? No

Man? No

An Extraterrestrial group? No

Is this against one's free will to leave? Yes

Is the trap of reincarnation broken? Yes

A soul is free to leave the Earth realm and go where they please? Yes

This soul extraction is to hold the soul and enclose it into another body? No

That means they would have to transfer the consciousness? Yes

The consciousness and the soul are one? Yes

The one thing these entities couldn't do was to originally give the spark of life? Yes

So they are soul snatching another way? Yes

Does it work? Yes

Was there ever a photo of a patent for the term Black online? Yes

Was it real? No

African-American? Yes

Was it real? No

(You can't patent a term like Black or African-American)

                               Cern

Does she work currently with CERN as an employee? No

Did she ever? No

Does Astrid Struckelberger  have access to someone that works with CERN? Yes

Is this person she knows reliable? Yes

Honest? Yes

Has her insider ever given her misinformation? No

Can we trust what she is given? Yes

Has she ever misrepresented any information to the public? No

Did CERN destroy 5 parallel universes? No

Did they close CERN because an entity was on its way here? Yes

Is this the true reason for its closure? Yes

At the last reading you said they would reopen CERN in July of 2027? Yes

Are they taking a chance it redirected somewhere else? Yes

Is this entity what I felt in the Summer of 2025 that woke me up in a panic? Yes

Is this the same entity or frequency that woke me up not to long ago from my dream state in a panic? Yes

                     

Was Hitler swarthy? Yes

Was this the original Hitler? Yes

Was the swarthy Hitler a menace? No

Was he evil or vindictive? No

Did he rid his country of porn and hate? Yes

Was his economy stable? Yes

Were there alot of swarthy Germans who lived during the time of Hitler? Yes

Was he married? Yes

Was she swarthy? Yes

Did the swarthy Hitler have children? Yes

Was the swarthy Hitler fair to his people? Yes

Was the swarthy Hitler replaced by white man? Yes

Was the replacement an actor? Yes

Did he use the swastika? Yes

Was the swarthy Hitler killed? Yes

Was his wife and children killed? Yes

By who? The Black Nobiity? Yes

The replacements purpose was to destroy what he built? Yes

          MK Ultra and Mind Control

Project Paperclip was a mind control program? Yes

A Mk Ultra program? Yes

When they supposedly took out the third Reich, was that the real Hitler? Yes

Was the real Hitler replaced by an actor? Yes

Was Mk Ultra and mind control performed on patients in Pysche Hospitals? Yes

MK Ultra(added 10/30/26

Was it performed on those at Eloise Hospital in Detroit? Yes

Is that building haunted to this day? Yes

I heard the building was being demolished. Correct? No

Are there spirits there who did not pass over? Yes

Was LSD tainted in the 1960's during the hippy movement? Yes

Is mind control still being practiced on people from their government? Yes

Is the Mk Ultra program still being practiced by all governments of the world? Yes

                         Michigan Voting 

All I hear when I see this man's face is the constant theme song, "You can split your ticket." And the sentence, "Black people are voting against their interest."  Before I get home his voting adis on the radio. When I get home a flyer on the door for him. That's the spirits way of saying pay attention or do a reading. So, I'm doing the reading. 

Do you want me to do a reading on Abdul El-Sayad? Yes

Did he once work in the medical field? Yes

Does he have the experience to run? No

Is he honest about the things he has put out in the public? No

Is he truly for the American people? No

Will he uphold the U.S. Constitution and stand for what Michigan residents want? No

I hear the words Act Blue? Fast Yes

 Donations that are poised  to help a candidate with their campaign that actually go to an organization called Act Blue? No

Is Act Blue an organization where donations are intended for a certain politician but it goes to fund something else? Yes

Does his donations tunnel over to Act Blue? No

Come from here ( Act Blue)? Yes

All this is alleged on my end. (Rods affirmed my comment)

Does Act Blue go against the interest of the people? Yes

Is he aligned with any Muslim groups that act against the interest of the people of this state? No

With the Michigan Constitution? No

With the U.S. Constitution? No

Should people be concerned for having him in public office? No

Are there any other politicians who are running against the interest of the people? Yes

Jocelyn Benson (Governor)? Yes

John James (Governor)? No

Dr. Brooks (Senate)? No

Mike Roger's (Senate)? No

Douglas P.Marsh (Senate)? No

 Lydia Christenson (Senate)? No

Timothy Long (Senate)? No

Haley Steven's (Senate)? Yes

Did you know she was a Zionist Democrat.  She's so hyped up about it too. Notice they mention Abdul Sayed's name.   (Added 11/2/26)

If elected will Sayed do what he states he will do? Yes

"Sponsor legislation to ban corporate money from our elections"? No

"Nominate Justices to the Supreme Court who will overturn Citizens United, and support legislation to bring transparency to lobbying and “dark money” political organizations"? Yes

"Will never accept corporate contributions"? Yes

"Fight against corporate tax breaks?" Yes

 "To enforce antitrust laws, so corporations can’t keep buying each other and price-gouging us"? Yes

This takes me back to my question on voting.

Will any of this matter come 2027? No

Will these votes become void? Yes

Do they even count now? No

Added Nov. 5 2026

As for now Abdul El-Sayad will do what he states, but things can change if he aligns himself later down the line with lobbyist, or other entities, that he decides to act against what he spoke while campaigning. I personally don't like him. He gives off bad energy, and he sounds like Obama wearing a skinsuit. 

He says the same thing I've said, "Black" people are voting against their interest.

My instincts told me he was connected in some way to some horrid Islamic organization. (Added Nov. 7, 2026)